Method of testing.
Concrete strength.
Results.
Time.
Cost.
Just a few questions we are going to find the answer now.
Forwards to the table, we advise using standards first. In this case, it translates to a work-method that is easy to follow.
Use maturity the maturity method to have a better operation, to cut costs, time, for better quality.
And break samples to validate your products, comply with regulations and build trust in your operations.
| Break Test | Maturity Method | |
| What type is the method? | Destructive | Non-destructive |
| How is the concrete strength found? | Compression test results of samples | Temperature history of the product |
| Whan are strength results available? | Only after doing a break test | Continuous information on the in-place strength development |
| How valid are the test results? | Temperature and curing speed of the samples are not the same as the product. Samples have slower strength development. | Uses the actual temperature history of the product to give a more accurate estimation of the strength of the product. |
| What is the strength development in the structure? | Assumes that the entire product develops strength at the same rate. As temperature variances result in a different rate of strength development throughout the product. | Possible to monitor and follow the strength development at different locations and parts of the product, including critical, cold and hot spots. |
| How is it accecting the project schedule? | Waiting for break tests can cause unnecessary time spent and increases the risk of delays. | Results can b followed in real-time, which saves time and improves project efficiency. |
| What is the method best suited for? | Long-term strength validation. | Early-age strength estimation. |